Case Study in Curricculum Development
Ma. Abigail V. Camacho
Mr. Herbert P. Vargas
What are some major differences between electronic testing and regular testing? Do you feel that that electronic online testing is worth the cost? Why or why not?
The major differences between the electronic testing and regular testing are in electronic testing is a testing to measure your knowledge and ability to apply concepts, terms, and principles involved in working on although the test contains some factual questions, it emphasizes your understanding of the subject and your ability to apply what you know. According to MEIJER in the year 1999 the benefits of electronic testing to the educators is to give information on the accuracy in answer gathering, analysis of scoring results and the reduction of human error in test taking, as well as computation and analysis of the test results on the computer. The electronic online testing is worth the cost because it is easy to use like in business, training & educational assessment with tests and quizzes graded instantly. Electronic testing or eTesting for short, just means that you will take the test using a computer or other electronic device instead of pencil and paper. eTesting has an ability to include novel types of questions which could potentially be graphical in nature or dynamic by using animations. In some cases test questions are drawn from question banks. If that is the case, everyone may receive a different version of the test. Depending on the option settings of the test, you may be able to see your score immediately upon completing the test.
How might Principal Harris deal with resistance from teachers who oppose the use of electronic testing and data analysis?
Principal Harris wanted to have a good standards regarding in the processing of grade and he also want to have an organize grading system that will be use in the electronic testing and data analysis. It can be use by the teachers in school because it helps to develop their learning in computer and applying it in their teaching strategy. Principal Harris should first state the objectives to the teacher. He also need to know the ideas of other teachers and the stakeholder that has something to do with the curriculum and which strategy will fit the plan. The electronic learning (e-learning) literature has not addressed the measurement of learner satisfaction with asynchronous e-learning systems. Current models for measuring user satisfaction (US) and students’ evaluation of teaching effectiveness (SETE) are perceived as inapplicable as they are targeted primarily towards either organizational information systems or classroom education environment. My study developed a comprehensive model and instrument for measuring learner satisfaction with asynchronous e-learning systems. The procedures used in conceptualizing the survey, generating items, collecting data, and validating the multiple-item scale are described. This study carefully examined evidence of reliability, content validity, criterion-related validity, convergent validity, discriminate validity, and homological validity by analyzing data from a sample of 116 adult respondents. The norms of the instrument were then developed, and the potential applications for practitioners and researchers explored. Finally, this paper discusses limitations of the work. The empirically validated instrument should be useful to other researchers in developing and testing their e-learning theories. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0378720603000284
If the principal meets with other teachers about using a data analysis approach, what should be discussed?
The important role of the principal is to discuss the purposes of using the data analysis approach by explaining different goals on how we can use the data in providing information and data of grading system and...
Please join StudyMode to read the full document