Over the last twenty years technology is guiding our lifestyle, i.e. how we should live, how should we communicate and also how one shall learn. Discoll (2000) defines learning as “a persisting change in human performance or performance potential which must come about as a result of the learner’s experience and interaction with the world.” In other words learning is defined as lasting changed state (emotional, mental physiological- skills) brought about as a result of experiences and interactions with the content or people. This definition holds the notion that gaining knowledge is an objective of learning (or a style) that is attainable if not already innate through either reasoning or experiences. It is known that learners create knowledge as they make attempts to understand their experience, as they are not empty vessels to be filled in with knowledge Instead learners are actively attempting to create meaning, they often select and pursue their own learning styles. Although it is believed that real life learning is messy and complex, but methods which emulate the fuzziness of this kind of learning is more effective for lifelong learning. Earlier the life of knowledge is measured in decades but today as knowledge is growing exponentially, and there we may have such fields where the life of knowledge is measured in months and weeks. Today what is known may become obsolete after few weeks. According to (ASTD) American Society of Training & Documentation the amount of knowledge in the world has doubled in the past 10 years and is doubling every 10 months as a result this is responsible for the shrinking half life of knowledge. It is believed that because of these trends in the development of knowledge formal education remains no more the ultimate source of learning, rather learners are switching on to a variety of sources like personal networks, communities of practice and personal experiences. As we can no longer personally experience and acquire learning that we need to act in this digital age making connections has become necessary to keep moving the learning theories. We may derive our learning, competence and expertise by forming connections with the experiences of others, as experience has long been considered the best teacher of knowledge, so here the quote “I store my knowledge in my friends mind” becomes an axiom for collecting knowledge by collecting people of varied experiences. Chaos is the new reality for the learners to attain knowledge, as with Chaos learners foster their understanding by deriving out the meaning of their task which has hidden patterns and their chaos unveil that meaning. Chaos as a science connects specialized communities and further it connects everything to anything. It recognises the adjacent patterns for new knowledge which is a key to learning.
Since technology is getting advanced day by day thereby altering one brain, it further defines and shapes our thinking. In today knowledge economy it is necessary to form connection between the sources of information in order to develop useful informational patterns or a network, it can be computer or social networking which works on the simple principle that people groups systems nodes, entities all can be connected to create an integrated whole. This way sharing and exchanging of ideas may greatly lead to the notion of serendipity, innovation and creativity. In their new learning styles if students are connected to their teachers, their peers, and with other social groups through various networks. It may be possible that they come up with new ideologies and experiences which will result in the enhancement of their learning, researches in the past have indicated that cognitive (interactive and experimental) learning is the result of “Mental Construction” in a collaborative learning environment. It is believed that
Learning and knowledge rests in diversity of opinions.
Learning is a process of connecting specialized...
References: Abdullahi OE (1989). Prevalence of adolescent 's problems among Ebira secondary school students in Kwara State: It implications for counselling. Unpublished M. Ed. project, University of Ibadan, Ibadan. Nigeria.
Adebiyi DA (2006). Effect of motivation on junior secondary school students’ performance in reading comprehension in Moro Local Government Area of Kwara State, Nigeria. Unpublished M.Ed project, University of Ilorin, Ilorin, Nigeria.
Adebule SO (2004). Gender differences on a locally standardized
anxiety reading scale in Mathematics for Nigerian secondary schools.
Niger. J. Couns. Appl. Psychol. Adelusi I0 (1982). Relationship between selected variables in achievement in English as a second language, Unpublished Ph.D. thesis submitted to University of Ibadan, Ibadan.
Crawford, Curtis (2000).Should the U.S. strive for Equal Racial and Ethnic Cultural Education. Bilingual Research Journal. [26(2)], 2-9.
Elmasry, Faiza (2005, December 28). IMDiversity.com. Retrieved February 23, 2006, from http://www.imdiversity.com Web site: http://www.imdiversity.com/villages/asian/education_academia_study/voa_asian_
Ingles, S. (2005). A profile of the american high school sophomore in 2002: initial results from the base year of the education longitudinal study of 2002. Education Statistics Quarterly, 7(1 & 2), 1 - 9.
Noguera, P (1997). Building School and University Partnerships Based Upon Mutual Benefit and Respect. Berkley, CA: Excellence Through Collaboration and Outreach Center.
Schweingruber, W. (2002). Apples and oranges: a discussion of the use of international comparisons in mathematics education reform. Retrieved Jan. 22, 2006, from http://www.math.umd.edu/~dac/650/schweingruberpaper.html.
Shimahara, N., & Holowinsky, I. (2001). Ethnicity, race, and nationality in education: a global perspective.
Please join StudyMode to read the full document