EED 470 Reading Strategies

Topics: Education, Educational psychology, Reading Pages: 6 (1337 words) Published: March 8, 2015


Kristen Orton
Grand Canyon University: EED 470
January 7, 2015

Constructivism and explicit teaching styles almost appear to be opposites of one another, especially when used in the contexts of the classroom. The more I read about these two styles the more I thought that if a teacher could use both styles in a harmonious balance the students would have the greatest benefit. Not many students want to sit and listen to the droning lecture of a teacher. Memorizing facts, reading chapter after chapter with no connection to how it will be used outside of school. This old fashion way of teaching typically does not assist students in retaining information. Nor does this help with motivating students to continue reading. I also believe that each style could be use more or less depending on the grade level of the students being taught, perhaps also depending upon the subject matter.

Constructivism teaching models are more about what children can do and how they can use new information rather than simple learning about something. The teacher’s role is less of the sole authority of the topic and takes on a role as a guide in the education process. Tetzlaff, author of Constructivist Learning Versus Explicit Teaching, really explained what this could look like in the classroom. She stated that the instructor guides the learning though questions and discussion not lectures (Tetzlaff, 2009). In reading concepts such as phonics, vocabulary or comprehension is not taught through a lecture but rather introduced by the teacher. The teacher would jump-start the activity giving the students a basis to begin and then setback and assist in the learning process. Interactive actives, games and lesson are used to teach a topic. The instructor can then dig deeper into the knowledge that the students are gaining through questions and additional guidance. Additionally “various types of materials are used, all chosen with an attempt to use items that are concrete, colorful, appealing to the interests of learners, developmentally appropriate, and accessible to a variety of ability levels (Evangelisto, 2002).

The explicit learning model is how I remember school being in almost every class. The teacher had a pre-determined goal that the students were to reach in a set way. The route of how the students learned the information was basically the same. In a classroom with explicit instruction the teacher has a very clear objective and lesson plan. The teacher teaches to meet that goal not necessarily allowing the students to deviate from the goal or the path to get there. The education is very much teacher-directed. As a student this is how I remember all of my classes. When I became a Freshman I was able to take biology, I was extremely disappointed when we read from the textbook day after day. I desired a hands on classroom with much less note taking and more exploration. In some instruction this can be very important. A kindergarten teacher has to ensure that the class all learns that the alphabet has a correct order. They have to learn that the symbol represents a letter and a sound. This will all build up to teaching that the letters when combined create words. Explicit teaching style believes that students use their internal understanding to comprehend external information where as constructivist is reversed.

As a child I began reading in first grade. I have never had any reading difficulties or struggles. By the time I was is second grade my mom had to threaten me nightly, grounding me from books because I would get lost in the stories and stay up way past bedtime. Books always have surrounded me. Everyone in my extended family also read. I think this natural love for books was simply instilled in me not by force but as a passion. I remember curling up on my Oma’s swing reading, The Secret Garden. In school the only hesitation I have ever experienced in reading involved public speaking due to high anxiety. My own children...

References: Evangelisto, T. (2002). Constructivist Approaches to Teaching and Learning. Palm Springs, California. http://www.tcnj.edu/~evangeli/constructivism.htm
Facts About Reading Aloud. (n.d.). Retrieved January 11, 2015, from http://www.rif.org/us/literacy-resources/articles/facts-about-reading-aloud.htm
Garcia, G. E., Pearson, P. D., Taylor, B. M., Bauer, E. B., & Stahl, K. D. (2011). Socio- Constructivist and Political Views on Teachers ' Implementation of Two Types of Reading Comprehension Approaches in Low-Income Schools. Theory Into Practice, 50(2), 149-156. doi:10.1080/00405841.2011.558444
Tetzlaff, T. (2009). Constructivist Learning Versus Explicit Teaching: A Personal Discovery of Balance. (A Synthesis Project). University of Massachusetts, Boston.
Ciampa, K. (2012). Electronic Storybooks: A Constructivist Approach to Improving Reading Motivation in Grade 1 Students. Canadian Journal Of Education, 35(4), 92-136. http://www.cct.umb.edu/tetzlaff.pdf
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Reading Strategies Essay
  • Reading Comprehension Strategies Essay
  • Teaching Strategies for Reading Comprehension Essay
  • Essay about Teaching Reading Strategies
  • reading strategies Research Paper
  • Reading Strategy Essay
  • QAR: A Reading Comprehension Strategy Essay
  • reading strategies Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
Heroes mas alla del deber temporada 2 capitulo 2 descarga gratis | Banking System of China | Ef: A Tale of Memories (12)