Green Chemistry in California

Topics: Chemistry, Chemical reaction, Chemical industry Pages: 244 (51973 words) Published: April 15, 2013

Green Chemistry in California:
A Framework for Leadership in
Chemicals Policy and Innovation
Michael P. Wilson
with Daniel A. Chia and Bryan C. Ehlers

Prepared for:
The California Senate Environmental Quality Committee
The California Assembly Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials


Copyright© 2006
by the Regents of the University of California
All rights reserved
California Policy Research Center
1950 Addison Street, Suite 203
Berkeley, CA 94720-7410
Phone: (510) 642-5514
Fax: (510) 642-8793
Program and publications information: e-mail:

About the California Policy Research Center and This Report The California Policy Research Center (CPRC), a University of California program under the aegis of the Office of the President, applies the UC system’s extensive research expertise to analysis, development, and implementation of state policy as well as federal policy on issues of statewide importance. CPRC provides technical assistance to policymakers, commissions policyrelevant research, and disseminates research findings and recommendations through publications and special briefings.

This report was prepared in response to a January 2004 request for technical assistance in the area of chemicals policy from California State Senator Byron Sher, chair of the Senate Environmental Quality Committee, and Assembly Member John Laird, chair of the Assembly Committee on Environmental Safety and Toxic Materials. The request was prompted by the committees’ interest in a California chemicals policy that would address public and environmental health concerns while also building long-term capacity in the design, production, and use of chemicals that are safer for humans and the environment. The committees were also interested in the implications for California of chemicals policy developments occurring in the European Union.

The California Policy Research Center, the Northern California Center for Occupational and Environmental Health, and the University of California Toxic Substances Research and Teaching Program provided funding for this report.

The views and recommendations expressed are those of the principal author and do not necessarily represent the opinions of the sponsors or funders or the Regents of the University of California.
About the Authors
Michael P. Wilson, the principal author, is an assistant research scientist with the Northern California Center for Occupational and Environmental Health (COEH), School of Public Health, UC Berkeley. The California Legislature established COEH in 1978 (AB 3414) to improve understanding of occupational and environmental health problems in California and work toward their resolution through research, teaching, and service. The Northern California COEH consists of researchers and practitioners at UC Berkeley, UC San Francisco, and UC Davis. Daniel A. Chia and Bryan C. Ehlers conducted research for the report as part of their graduate studies at the Goldman School of Public Policy at UC Berkeley.

About the Advisory Committee
A 13-member Advisory Committee (see following page) provided technical oversight for the report. The full committee was convened one time. Committee members provided individual consultation to the primary author and written comments on three drafts of the report. The report, however, is not a consensus document; final responsibility for the report content rests with the primary author, not with the committee, individually or collectively.

The Advisory Committee
John R. Balmes, MD, Professor, School of Medicine, UC San Francisco Professor, Environmental Health Sciences, UC Berkeley
Carl F. Cranor, PhD, Professor, Department of Philosophy, UC Riverside S. Katharine Hammond, PhD, Professor, Environmental Health Sciences School of Public Health, UC Berkeley
Bill E. Kastenberg, PhD, Professor,...

References: Workshop Report ( (accessed October 24, 2005) p.
3. Washington, D.C.:National Academy Press, 2005 [hereinafter NAS Grand Challenges Report,
San Francisco, February 21, 2006;B7.
American Chemistry Council. Guide to the Business of Chemistry, p 37. Arlington,
Virginia:American Chemistry Council, 2003 [hereinafter ACC Guide, 2003].
Agency, 2003 [hereinafter EPA OPPT Overview 2003].
decision for non-HPV existing chemicals? (2005) [hereinafter NPPTAC, 2005].
Cambridge, Massachusetts:Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press, 2000.
Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office, 2004.
Washington, D.C.:U.S. Government Printing Office, 2003.
Geiser K. Materials Matter. Cambridge, Massachusetts:The MIT Press, 2001.
WHO Terminology, 2004, supra note.
Klaassen, C. Casarett and Doull’s Toxicology: The Basic Science of Poisons, 6th Edition. New
York:McGraw-Hill, 2001 [hereinafter Klaassen, 2001].
Anastas P, Warner J. Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice. New York:Oxford University Press,
Washington, D.C.:American Chemical Society, 1998.
Clark K, MacQuarie D. Handbook of Green Chemistry and Technology. Oxford, United
Kingdom:Blackwell Science, 2002.
Lankey R, Anastas P. Advancing Sustainability Through Green Chemistry. New York:Oxford
University Press, 2002.
Science 297:807-810(2002).
Academy Press, 1988.
LaBonte R. Social inequality and healthy public policy. Health Promotion 1(3):341-351(1986).
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Green Chemistry Essay
  • Green Chemistry Essay
  • Essay on Green Chemistry
  • Chemistry Essay
  • chemistry Essay
  • Green Chemistry Essay
  • Green Chemistry
  • Green It Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
Download | Afterboom | christmas leslie odom jr