Integrating Constructive Feedback in Personalised E-Learning

Topics: Educational psychology, Learning, E-learning Pages: 16 (4910 words) Published: February 28, 2013
Integrating Constructive Feedback in Personalised E-Learning Jude T. Lubega1 and Shirley Williams2

Makerere University, Faculty of Computing and Information Technology, P.O. Box 7062, Kampala, Uganda, East Africa 2 Department of Computer Science, University of Reading, P.O. Box 225, Whiteknights, Reading, Berkshire, RG6 6AY, United Kingdom

Abstract. When using e-learning material some students progress readily, others have difficulties. In a traditional classroom the teacher would identify those with difficulties and direct them to additional resources. This support is not easily available within e-learning. A new approach to providing constructive feedback is developed that will enable an e-learning system to identify areas of weakness and provide guidance on further study. The approach is based on the tagging of learning material with appropriate keywords that indicate the contents. Thus if a student performs poorly on an assessment on topic X, there is a need to suggest further study of X and participation in activities related to X such as forums. As well as supporting the learner this type of constructive feedback can also inform other stakeholders. For example a tutor can monitor the progress of a cohort; an instructional designer can monitor the quality of learning objects in facilitating the appropriate knowledge across many learners. Keywords: E-Learning, Tracking, Constructive Personalisation, Knowledge Construction. Feedback, LMS,

1 Introduction
The internet has created possibilities for transferring, sharing and reusing content. The increasing adoptation of the internet use in higher education learning demonstrates its potential as a future learning medium. Educational providers are exploring the effective use of e-learning by incorporating it in their teaching. There are several factors that have influenced educational providers to incorporate Learning Management Systems (LMS) within teaching. These factors include the rapid increasing number of students, the need for learning and the need to prepare students to suit the knowledge economy [1]. The use of LMS has created better opportunities for learners to learn ubiquitously. The LMS are capable of creating, fostering, delivering, tracking and facilitating learning more effectively. However these learning tools have not yet fully realised the potential of learning standards [2, 3, 4] and technology by supporting stakeholders with constructive real-time feedback. The lack F.L. Wang et al. (Eds.): ICHL 2009, LNCS 5685, pp. 218–229, 2009. © Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2009

Integrating Constructive Feedback in Personalised E-Learning


of direct and immediate contact between the learner and tutor poses a threat to the quality of e-learning [5]. The teacher in a class setting is provided with a variety of opportunities for interacting and supporting learners. One of the key roles of the teacher is to support learners with constructive feedback during learning. The learners are able to reflect and improve on their knowledge construction. The difficulty with LMS to provide constructive feedback during e-learning has encouraged researchers to devise other effective methods. The current LMS have been further developed to incorporate technologies such as reusable learning objects [6]. These RLO enable instructional designers to configure content to suit individual learners and allow effective tracking where constructive feedback can be integrated. Reusable Learning Objects have created better opportunities in the content instruction which allows personalisation of content. Learners can request for this personalised content which is dependent on their learning styles [7]. Learning styles are methods, through which learners perceive, interpret and processes information [8]. Jung [9] asserts that learners process information in different ways which is dependent on their learning styles. The...

References: 1. Harasim, L.: Shift Happens: Online Education as a new Paradigm in Learning. Internet and Higher Education 3(1) (2000) 2. SCORM: Best Practices Guide for Content Developers. Learning Systems Architecture Lab (2005), (retrieved September 9, 2006)
J.T. Lubega and S. Williams
3. IEEE: Standard for Learning Object Metadata. Learning Technology Standards Committee (2003), (retrieved August 15, 2006) 4. IMS: IMS Open Specifications for Interoperable Learning Technology (2003), (retrieved August 15, 2006) 5. Hill, J.R.: Overcoming obstacles and creating connections: Community building in Webbased learning environments. Journal of Computing in Higher Education 14(1), 67–86 (2002) 6. Wiley, D.A.: Connecting learning objects to instructional design theory: A definition, a metaphor, and a taxonomy. In: Wiley, D.A. (ed.) The Instructional Use of Learning Objects (2000), (retrieved June 23, 2006) 7. Keefe, J.W.: Learning style: An overview. In: NASSP’s Student learning styles: Diagnosing and prescribing programs Reston, pp. 1–17. National Association of Secondary School Principals, VA (1979) 8. Bergeron, D.P., Rosen, D.H., Arnau, R.C., Mascaro, N.: Picture Interpretation and Jungian Typology. Journal of Analytical Psychology 48(1), 83–99 (2003) 9. Jung, C.G.: Psychological types or the psychology of individuation, Brace, Harcourt, New York (1923) 10. Fosnot, C.: Constructivism: A Psychological theory of learning. In: Fosnot, C. (ed.) Constructivism: Theory, perspectives, and practice. Teachers College Press, New York (1996) 11. Steffe, L.P., Gale, J.: Constructivism in Education. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1995) 12. Honebein, P.C., Duffy, T., Fishman, B.: Constructivism and the Design of Learning Environment: Context and Authentic Activities for Learning. In: Duffy, T.M., Lowyck, J., Jonassen, D. (eds.) Design Environments for Constructivist Learning, pp. 87–108. Springer, Heidelberg (1993) 13. Chickering, A.W., Gamson, Z.F.: Seven Principles for good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin, 3–7 (1987) 14. Cisco: Cisco Reusable Learning Object Strategy: Designing and Developing Learning Objects for Multiple Learning Approaches (2003), (retrieved August 15, 2006) 15. Sun, L., Williams, S.: An Instructional Design Model for Constructivist Learning. In: Conference Proceedings, EdMedia 2004, World Conference on Multimedia, Hypermedia and Telecommunication, Lugano, Switzerland, pp. 2476–2483 (2004) 16. Lubega, J., Sun, L., Williams, S.A.: A Method for Personalised Tracking in Knowledge Construction. In: 4th European Conference on e-Learning (ECEL), Amsterdam, The Netherlands (2005) 17. Elwood, J., Klendowski, V.: Creating of Shared Practice: The Challenges of Assessment Use in Learning and Teaching. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 3, 243–256 (2002) 18. Stiggins, R.: Assessment Crisis: The Absence of Assessment FOR Learning. Phi Delta Kappan 83, 758–765 (2002) 19. Torrance, H., Pryor, J.: Investigating Formative Assessment. Open University Press, Buckingham (1998) 20. Sun, L., Fu, Y.: Interoperability for eLearning Services Management and Provision. Journal of World Wide Web: Internet and Web Information Systems 8, 1–18 (2005) 21. Wiggins, G.: Educative assessment: Designing assessments to inform and improve student performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (1998)
Integrating Constructive Feedback in Personalised E-Learning
22. Duffy, T.M., Cunningham, D.J.: Constructivism: Implications for the design and delivery of instruction. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. MacMillian Library, New York (1996) 23. Kluger, A.N., DeNisi, A.: The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis and preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin 119, 2 (1996) 24. Mory, E.H.: Feedback research revisited. In: Jonassen, D.H. (ed.) Handbook of research for educational communications and technology. MacMillian Library, New York (2003) 25. Lubega, J., Sun, L., Williams, S.: A Design for Generating Personalised Feedback in Knowledge Construction, pp. 302–310. Springer, Heidelberg (2005) 26. Rowntree, D.: Assessing Students: How Shall We Know Them. Kogan Page, London (1987) 27. Gipps, C.V.: Beyond Testing: Towards a Theory of Educational Assessment. The Falmer Press, London (1994) 28. Lubega, J., Williams, S.: A Study of Factors Contributing to Late Submission of Course Work. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-learning (EURODL), 2 (2006) 29. Grabtree, I., Soltysiak, S.: Identifying and Tracking Changing Interests. International Journal of Digital Libraries 2, 38–53 (1998) 30. Koychev, I., Schwab, I.: Adaptation to Drifting User’s Intersects. In: ECML2000/MLnet workshop: ML in the New Information Age, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 39–45 (2000) 31. Paiva, A., Machado, I.: Lifelong Training with Vincent, a Web-based Pedagogical Agent. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Lifelong Learning 12(1-4), 254–256 (2002)
Continue Reading

Please join StudyMode to read the full document

You May Also Find These Documents Helpful

  • Essay on E Learning
  • Essay about e learning
  • e-learning Essay
  • E-Learning Essay
  • feedback in learning Essay
  • E-Learning Essay
  • Essay on e learning
  • personalised learning Essay

Become a StudyMode Member

Sign Up - It's Free
Luxembourg | Denis First, Reznikov & Bright Sparks | El Aprendiz