Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology Volume 4, 2007 The Cultural Impact of Information Systems –
Through the Eyes of Hofstede – A Critical Journey
University of Wollongong,
Central Queensland University,
With the increasing levels of multiculturalism in today’s business and the proliferation and essentiality of information systems, development and management of IS needs to be considered in light of the cultural factors which impact upon its utility. Hofstede’s work on culture is the most widely cited in existence. His observations and analysis provide scholars and practitioners a valuable insight into the dynamics of cross-cultural relationships. However, such a groundbreaking body of work does not escape criticism. Hofstede has been dogged by academics discrediting his work in part or whole. Nonetheless, far more scholars exist who support Hofstede than those that don’t. Most quote Hofstede’s work with unabashed confidence, many including his findings as absolute assumptions.
This paper takes a critical look at Hofstede’s work and applies his findings to the practical needs of information systems. The paper finds support for the dimensions promoted by Hofstede in regard to information systems, but recommends continued research to provide greater clarity and continued applicability of his espoused dimensions.
Keywords: Culture, Information Systems, Hofstede, Cultural Dimensions, Cross-Cultural Research. Introduction
"Undoubtedly, the most significant cross-cultural study of work-related values is the one carried out by Hofstede” (Bhagat & McQuaid, 1982) Much interest has been placed on culture in business in the last two decades, and with growing national diversity in today’s business, culture remains an important dimension. The study of the field began in earnest with the work of Hofstede with his landmark study of IBM (Hofstede 1980), and with Peters and Waterman who started the organisation culture sensation with “In Search of Excellence” (Peters &
Waterman 1982). Preceding these studies
however, was the work of Bartels
(1967) who was one of the first to relate
the importance of culture, illustrating
the concept in decision-making and
business ethics. Bartels identifies several
criteria for the identification of cultural
Material published as part of this publication, either on-line or in print, is copyrighted by the Informing Science Institute. Permission to make digital or paper copy of part or all of these works for personal or classroom use is granted without fee
provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage AND that copies 1) bear this notice
in full and 2) give the full citation on the first page. It is permissible to abstract these works so long as credit is given. To
copy in all other cases or to republish or to post on a server or to redistribute to lists requires specific permission and payment of a fee. Contact Publisher@InformingScience.org to request
The Cultural Impact of IS
• Respect for individuality;
• Nature of Power and Authority;
• Rights of Property;
• Concept of Deity;
• Relation of Individual to State;
• National Identity and Loyalty;
• Values, Customs and Mores;
Culture is important for many aspects of business life especially with regard to the design, development and management of Information Systems (IS) protocols and infrastructure (Myers and Tan 2002). Kumar and Bjom-Andersen (1990) claim that design and management choices in IS are the result of individual values, and these values are a product of socio-cultural background: The designers' values are the product of the professional, social, and organizational context within which they are held, and of the individual's background and education. Accordingly, their design...
References: Ali, I., Pascoe, C. & Warne, L. (2002). Interactions of organizational culture and collaboration in working
Argote, L. (1999). Organizational learning: Creating, retaining, and transferring knowledge. Boston, Kluwer
Argote, L. & Ingram, P. (2000). Knowledge transfer: a basis for competitive advantage in firms. Organizational
Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(1), 150-169.
Bartels, R. (1967). A Model for Ethics in Marketing. Journal of Marketing, 31(1), 20-26.
Baum, J. & Ingram, P. (1998). Survival-enhancing learning in the Manhattan hotel industry, 1898-1980.
Bhagat, R. S. & McQuaid, S. J. (1982). Role of subjective culture in organizations: A review and directions
for future research
Bond, M. H. (2002). Reclaiming the individual from Hofstede 's ecological analysis- A 20-year odyssey:
comment on Oyserman et al
Cavusgil, S. T. & Das, A. (1997). Methodology issues in cross-cultural sourcing research - A primer. Marketing
Intelligence & Planning, 15(5), 213.
Ciampa, M. (2005). Security+ guide to network security fundamentals. Thomson/Course Technology.
d 'Iribarne, P. (1996). The usefulness of an ethnographic approach to the international comparison of organizations.
DiMaggio, P. (1997). Culture and cognition. Annual Review of Sociology, 23(1), 263-287.
Dorfman, P. W. & Howell, J. P. (1988). Dimensions of national culture and effective leadership patterns:
Furrer, O. (2000). The relationships between culture and service quality perceptions: Basis for crosscultural
market segmentation and resource allocation
Graves, D. (1986). Corporate culture - Diagnosis and change: Auditing and changing the culture of organizations.
Hansen, M. (1999). The search-transfer problem: The role of weak ties in sharing knowledge across organization
Hays, R. D., Anderson, R. & Revicki, D. (1993). Psychometric considerations in evaluating health-related
quality of life measures
Henry, G. T. (1990). Practical sampling. Newbury Park, Sage Publications.
Ho, T. H., Raman, K. S. & Watson, R. T. (1989). Group decision support systems: The cultural factor. Proceedings
of the Tenth International Conference on Information Systems, 119-129.
Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture 's consequences: International differences in work related values. Beverly
Hill, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (1991a). Culture and organisations. New York: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (1991b). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. London: McGraw-Hill.
Hofstede, G. (1997). The Archimedes effect. Working at the interface of cultures: 18 lives in social science.
Hofstede, G. (1998). Attitudes, Values and Organizational Culture: Disentangling the concepts. Organization
Studies, 19(3), 477.
Hofstede, G. (2002). Dimensions do not exist: A reply to Brendan McSweeney. Human relations, 55(11),
Hofstede, G. & Bond, M. H. (1984). Hofstede 's culture dimensions: An independent validation using
Rokeach 's value survey
Hofstede, G. & Bond, M. H. (1988). The Confucius connection: From cultural roots to economic growth.
Johnson, T. P. (1998). Approaches to equivalence in cross-cultural and cross-national survey research.
Kankanhalli, A., B. Tan, C. Y., Wei, K. K. & Holmes, M. C. (2004). Cross-cultural differences and information
systems developer values
Kraut, R. & Attewell, H. (1997). Media use in a global corporation electronic mail and organizational
Kumar, K. & Bjorn-Anderson, N. (1990). A cross-cultural comparison of IS designer values. Information
Systems, 33(5), 528-538.
Levin, D. & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective
Lindell, M. & Arvonen, J. (1996). The Nordic management style in a European context. International Studies
of Management & Organization, 26(3), 73.
Lubrosky, L. (1959). Psychotherapy. Annual Review of Psychology, 10(1), 317-344.
Markus, M. L. (1994). Finding a happy medium: Explaining the negative effects of electronic communication
on social life at work
Markus, M. L. & Soh, C. (2002). Structural influences on global e-commerce activity. Journal of Global
Information Management, 10(1), 5-12.
Martin, J. & Frost, P. J. (1996). The organizational culture war games: A struggle for intellectual dominance.
McGrath, J. E. & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Groups interacting with technology: Ideas, evidence, issues
and an agenda
McSweeney, B. (2000). The fallacy of national culture identification. 6th Interdisciplinary Perspectives on
Accounting Conference, Manchester, UK.
McSweeney, B. (2000). Hofstede 's model of national cultural differences and their consequences: A triumph
of faith – a failure of analysis
Michael, J. (1997). A conceptual framework for aligning managerial behaviors with cultural work values.
Myers, M. D. & Tan, F. B. (1997). Beyond models of national culture in information systems research.
Nasif, E. G., Al-Daeaj, H., Ebrahimi, B. & Thibodeaux, M. S. (1991). Methodological problems in crosscultural
research: An update
Newman, K. L. (1996). Culture and congruence: The fit between management practices and national culture.
Olie, R. (1995). The 'culture ' factor in personnel and organization policies. In A. Harzing & V. R. J. London,
International Human Resource Management: An integrated approach (pp
Peters, T. J. & Waterman, R. H. J. (1982). In search of excellence. New York: Harper & Row.
Redpath, L. (1997). A comparison of native culture, non-native culture and new management ideology.
Ross, D. N. (1999). Culture as a context for multinational business: A framework for assessing the strategyculture
Schneider, S. C. & Barsoux, J.-L. (1997). Managing across cultures. Europe: Prentice Hall.
Schwartz, S. H. (1999). A theory of cultural values and some implications for work. Applied Psychology,
Shanks, G., Parr, A., Hu, B., Corbitt, B., Thanasankit, T. & Seddon, P. (2000). Differences in critical success
factors in ERP systems implementation in Australia and China: A cultural analysis
Smith, M. (1998). Culture and organisational change. Management Accounting, 76(7), 60.
Søndergaard, M. (1994). Hofstede 's consequences: A study of reviews, citations and replications. Organization
Please join StudyMode to read the full document