The focal point of this research is motivation of the global workforce. The research will focus on cultural differences that influence the motivation across the global workforce. The study will be based on the Hofstede Cultural Dimension Theory. The Study examines six countries that represent different cultural values: India, Australia, China, United States, Japan, and Mexico. It also analyses practices of motivation and the problem of bridging cultures in a global workplace. The reason for this study is to review available data that could be used by managers working with a diverse workforce and for the further studies of motivation of the global workforce.
Motivation of Cross-cultural Workforce What Why How II.
The Hofstede Cultural Dimension Theory
Motivation of Workforce in:
Motivation in a workplace plays a significant role across the cultures. Looking into different cultures, one may say that one culture works harder than the other. Because productivity can not be measured only by individual abilities to perform the task, but also will to act, motivation has been in the center of the discussion for promoting the effectiveness of an organization. In a cross-cultural perspective, motivation is defined under a set of vectors that sums up a behavior. These vectors are initiation, direction, persistence, intensity, or termination of a particular action This definition shows us a multi-dimensional part of cross-cultural motivation. This is also a prove that cross-cultural motivation can not be assessed based on a singular perspective. Variables that form multi-dimension meaning depend on environment, political system, social pattern, culture, and approach towards work (Cross-cultural Management Network, 2006). From the organization's standpoint, work motivation is defined as the result of interaction between individual traits and organizational characteristics. This definition teaches us that motivation is addressed as the will to act and produce results despite the different processes that influence action. In this definition, a person's individuality and the organizational environment play a great role in defining motivation (Cross-cultural Management Network, 2006). The Hofstede Cultural Dimensional Theory
This study will focus on the Hofstede Cultural Dimensional Theory to answer the question; what motivates employees of a global workforce? The framework that Hofstede proposed consists of five factors that show the difference across cultures. The factors that drive motivation are based on the values accepted by a specific culture. Values, though, express motivational goals. First factor is: power distance, which is the degree of inequality between people, hierarchy or a source of power within organization. Second factor compares individualism, where human being think and judge independently versus collectivism in which fundamental unit of an entire system is group. Third factor compares masculinity versus femininity. It signifies the behavior according to gender. Uncertainty avoidance factor indicates what level of structure people expect in each country. The fifth factor is long term versus short term orientation, which determines how one looks at the future, how much value does one give to quick and risky action or long but predicted action. India
In the last decade, India is one of the leaders of the flat-earth, a term from Friedman's book the The World is Flat (Friedman, 2005). India is the leading outsourced service provider, especially in the software industry and business process outsourcing with one million jobs expected to move to the Indian rim (Moskalyuk, 2005). Cross-cultural communication between the Indian workforce and American managers is a prime example of cross-cultural motivation and leadership. Karina Schomer (2001) stated that the difference in...
References: Butler, P. (2006). India business etiquette, manners, cross cultural communication, and
India Geert Hofstede analysis
Cross-cultural Management Network. (2006). Motivation. Retrieved October 5, 2007,
Dunfee W. T. & Nagayasu Y. (1993) Business Ethics: Japan and the global economy,
Kulwer Academic Publishers
Fang, Y. (2004). Chinese managers and motivation for change: The challenges and a
Friedman, T (2005). The world is flat. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Gelfand, M., Erez M., Zeynep, A. (2007). Cross-cultural organizational behavior.
Annual review of psychology
Gupta-Biener, N. (2007). Is there a unique Indian leadership style? Retrieved October 5,
Ming-Yi, W. (2006). Compare participative leadership theories in three cultures. China
Moskalyuk, A. (2005). Indian outsourcing brought in $12 bln in 2004. Retrieved October
5, 2007, from http://blogs.zdnet.com/ITFacts/?p=9079
Nicol, J.,Taylor, S. (2006). Mexico business etiquette, manners, cross cultural
communication, and United States Geert Hofstede analysis
Nomura Research Institute Ltd. (2005). The key to management strategy in 2010 Is.
Retrieved October 7, 2007, from http://www.nri.co.jp/english/news/2005/051205.html
Roberts, K., Taylor, S. (2006). Unites States business etiquette, manners, cross cultural
communication, and United States Geert Hofstede analysis
Schomer, K. (2001). How culture affects motivation. Retrieved October 6,
2007, from http://www.cmct.net/articles_culture_motivation.html
Schomer, K. (2007). Workforce diversity in India and in the US. Retrieved October 5,
2007, from http://www.cmct.net/article_workforce_diversity.html
Williams, D. (2006). Australia business etiquette, manners, cross cultural
communication, and Australia Geert Hofstede analysis
Williams D. (2006). China business etiquette, manners, cross cultural communication,
and China Geert Hofstede analysis
and United States Geert Hofstede analysis. Retrieved October 5, 2007, from
Please join StudyMode to read the full document