Same-sex marriage There are many important issues discussed in public policy today. One of these issues is homosexual marriage. This is an important issue because it deals with a relatively large minority of the United States. This issue is put into many different lights. Those of morals, family values and religion; and those of equality, constitutionality, and right to privacy. The aspect with the most relevance is constantly left up to debate. Homosexuals are 'gay' due to a combination of factors. These factors are environment and society-the outside influences- and genetics. Hence, homosexuals do not decide their own sexuality, nor do heterosexuals. Therefore, homosexuals should have the same rights as heterosexuals, one of these rights being marriage. If it is proven that there is indeed a gene that causes homosexuality, than we can draw a parallel between not allowing homosexuals to marry and not allowing blonds to marry. This is why it is of great importance to public policy whether or not homosexuality is predetermined. Some now believe that homosexuality is genetically predetermined by a gene on the X chromosome. If this is the case, then gays cannot decide their sexual orientation, for it is predetermined. Hence, not allowing those who are genetically inclined to prefer the same sex to marry leaves homosexuals with three choices. The first is to remain celibate their entire lives so as not to "live in sin"; the second is to marry someone they do not truly love or find attractive simply for the marriage benefits; the third and final choice is to live together with their partner and face the dirty looks of fellow citizens, simply because they are living together though they are not married. Marriage goes beyond the benefits, however. The institution of marriage is a very respected one, and holds much sentimental value for many people. If we look at the Declaration of Independence for inspiration, we read that all men are created equal. Does this exclude homosexuals? Many think so simply because they believe that marriage is not a right, but a privilege. This argument means that because gays are not going to bring a child into the world, they do not deserve the privilege of marriage. Those that oppose this argument see marriage in a different way. They believe that if you love someone, you have the right to bond yourself to them legally. There are many legal and economic benefits to marriage. Studies show that, generally, married couples are more economically stable. When Sandra Rovira's life partner died in her arms from cancer, her partner's company, AT&T, denied any and all death benefits to her. AT&T made it clear that if the law recognized homosexual unions, so would they. Twelve years earlier, Ms. Rovira and her partner, Ms. Forlini, formalized their relationship in a ceremony where the two women exchanged rings and vows. However, because this ceremony is not recognized by the government, Ms. Rovira was denied the benefits that would have been given to her if she was a man who had gone through the same ceremony. An AT&T spokesperson, Maureen Lynch, was quoted as saying, "If we have a benefit for spouses and you don't have a spouse, that doesn't mean we've discriminated... If you're single, you're not being discriminated against, you just don't have anybody who's eligible for that benefit."(New York Times, 1989) This woman was being discriminated against because she did not have the option of marrying her partner. If Ms. Rovira and Ms. Forlini could have obtained a marriage that was seen as valid by the law, they would have been able to share the following benefit with many married heterosexual couples. "By the simple public act of marrying, men and women achieve a substantial package of rights and duties which, collectively provide support and predictability to their marital relationship: 1) legal recognition of their sexual union, 2) legal enforcement of their mutual obligation to financially support each...
Bibliography: 1. The Economist, Nov. 4, 1995 2. Gallagher, John. 1997 "Marriage compromised" The Advocate, 71(May) 3. Hafen, Larry C. 1997 "Bridle your passions: how modern law can protect the family." Vital Speeches, 20(August): 633-636 4. Holmes, Bob. 1994 "Gay gene test 'inaccurate and immoral '" New Scientist, 141(March): 9 5. Irvine, Reed, and Joe Goulden. 1993 "Gays give wrong spin on genetics." Insight on the News 35(August): 31-33 6. Kramer, Larry.1997 "Same-sex marriage, conflict of laws, and the unconstitutional public policy exception" Yale Law Journal 106(May): 1965-2008 7. Lawton, Kim A. 1997"State Lawmakers Scramble to Ban Same-Sex Marriages" Christianity Today 2(Feb) 84-86 8. Love and the Law. "Contrasting Legal Situations: Marriages & Committed, Loving, Same Sex Relationships" URL: (July 14, 1998) 9. Marshall, Elliot. 1995. "NIH 's "gay gene" study questioned." Science 268(June):1841- 1842 10. Miller, Neil.1989. In Search of Gay America. New York: The Atlantic Monthly Press. 11. McConnell, John.1997 :"A new marriage mantra," The Advocate, 759(May): 11 12. Mohr, Richard D. 1988. Gays/Justice: A Study of Ethics, Society, and Law. New York: Columbia University Press 13. Murphy, Timothy F. 1997. Gay Science. New York: Columbia University Press 14. Newsweek, March 3, 1992 15. The New York Times, September 21, 1989 16. Park, Alice. 1995 "New evidence of a "gay gene"." Time, 20(Nov):95 17. Radford, Tim. 1993:"Straight talk on the gay gene: will eugenics come out of the closet?" World Press Review, 9(September):23-25 18. Schuklenk, Udo, Edward Stein, Jacinta Kerin, and William Byne. 1997. "The ethics of genetic research on sexual orientation." The Hastings Center Report, 27(January):6-13 19. Thompson, Larry.1995. "Search for a gay gene." Time 24(June):60-61 20. US Congress, Defense of Marriage Act. 104th Congress, 2nd session, January 3, 1996 21. Watson, Traci, and Joseph P. Shapiro. 1995. "Is there a 'gay gene '?" U.S. News & World Report, 119(November):93-96 22. Weiner, Jonathan. 1995 "The Science of Desire: The Search for the Gay Gene and the Biology of Behavior." The New Republic, 1(Jan):35-37
Please join StudyMode to read the full document